When it comes to the debate of being steep versus shallow in the short game, there are differing opinions from experts. One expert, Parker McLachlin, advocates for a shallower angle of attack in the short game. McLachlin believes that engaging the bounce of the club can provide a greater margin for error on mishits. By maintaining proper fundamentals, a shallower attack angle is easier for the mid-handicapper to execute, making it a safer option near the greens.
While being shallow may offer more forgiveness for amateur golfers, there are still risks involved. For example, chunking the ball can occur if the weight is leaning back, causing the club to hit before the ball. However, with proper technique and control, a shallower angle of attack can help improve a golfer’s short game. McLachlin often advises his students to focus on sweeping the club rather than being steep in their approach to wedge shots. By tracing a wider swing arc and allowing the club to glide across the grass, golfers can increase their chances of success on pitch shots.
In contrast to McLachlin’s perspective, there are proponents of a steep approach in the short game. Joe Mayo, another golf instructor, has advocated for a steeper angle of attack for pitch shots. Mayo believes that a steeper approach can simplify the swing and lead to crisper ball contact. While being steep may offer benefits in terms of shot quality, it also comes with added risks, especially for the average golfer who may struggle with consistency.
One example often referenced in the debate between steep and shallow approaches is professional golfer Viktor Hovland. Hovland’s short game transformation, where he adopted a steeper angle of attack, has been a topic of discussion among golf enthusiasts. Despite his success with this change, Hovland’s statistics on strokes gained: Around-the-green and scrambling have not significantly improved. This raises questions about the effectiveness of a steep approach for all levels of golfers.
Ultimately, the decision to be steep or shallow in the short game comes down to personal preference and comfort. While some golfers may find success with a steep angle of attack, others may benefit more from a shallower approach. For amateur golfers looking to improve their consistency and limit mistakes near the greens, a shallower attack angle may provide a more forgiving option. By understanding the principles behind each approach and experimenting with both techniques, golfers can determine which style best suits their game and helps them achieve their desired results.
