AI Club Fitting Enters the Mainstream: What It Means for Golf’s Equipment Revolution
I’ve been around golf long enough to see equipment technology go from wooden drivers with leather grips to carbon composite heads with artificial intelligence. Last week, watching Johnny Wunder and Jake Morrow dig into AI fitting on the Fully Equipped Podcast got me thinking about where we are in this evolution—and frankly, it’s a fascinating inflection point.
In my 35 years covering this game, I’ve watched gear become increasingly central to how we talk about professional golf. When I was caddying for Tom Lehman back in the ’90s, club fitting meant a couple trips to the range with a club builder and honest feedback. Now? We’re talking about algorithms, machine learning, and software that can potentially see things about a golfer’s swing that the human eye misses.
The question the Fully Equipped team tackled—can AI actually fit golfers better than traditional methods?—isn’t just academic chatter. It’s the future knocking on the clubhouse door.
The Real Story Behind the Technology
What strikes me most about the current AI fitting conversation is how quickly it’s moved from “interesting experiment” to “serious business.” The podcast explored this territory with the kind of depth that casual fans don’t always appreciate. These aren’t lightweight gear commentators; Wunder and Morrow are talking to people who genuinely understand club mechanics and player biomechanics.
“Can AI fit our 2 biggest gear heads?”
That title alone tells you something. There’s a playful challenge buried in there—the implication that if AI can help the most knowledgeable equipment nerds in golf, maybe it’s worth paying attention to. And that’s the insight worth exploring.
In my experience, every major shift in golf equipment has followed the same pattern: skepticism, adoption by the pros, mainstream acceptance, and then the question of whether it actually made anyone significantly better. We saw it with metal woods, with cavity-back irons, with modern wedge grooves. Each time, there’s this tension between “this is the future” and “golf is fundamentally about feel and intuition.”
Why AI Fitting Matters Now
Here’s what’s different about artificial intelligence in club fitting compared to previous innovations: it’s not just making existing technology better. It’s potentially changing how we collect and interpret data about swing mechanics.
Traditional fitting relies on launch monitors, yes, but ultimately on a fitter’s judgment. That fitter—usually a skilled professional—combines objective data with experience-based intuition. AI removes some of that subjectivity. It can identify patterns across thousands of swings that a human might miss. It can account for micro-variations in tempo, strike location, and club path in ways that were impossible even five years ago.
The challenge, as anyone who’s actually tried high-tech fitting knows, is that golf is still a human game played by humans with emotional and psychological components that no algorithm captures. I’ve seen players with theoretically perfect specs play terrible golf because something about the club didn’t feel right. That feel factor—call it the intangible, call it the mental side—remains the wildcard.
Professional Tour Implications
What I find most interesting, having covered 15 Masters and countless tour events, is how this might reshape equipment conversations on the professional circuit. Tour players already have access to sophisticated fitting. What AI potentially offers them is a second opinion—or maybe a better first opinion—based on purely mechanical analysis.
Some of the best players I’ve watched over the decades are obsessive about equipment nuance. They notice millimeter differences in shaft flex, head weighting, and lie angles. For those players, AI fitting could be a legitimate edge. For others, it might just be more noise in an already equipment-obsessed environment.
The real professional interest, I suspect, isn’t in whether AI can fit better than humans. It’s whether AI can help identify which players are being poorly served by their current specs—and that’s a meaningful question across all skill levels.
The Balanced Take
I’m not one of these guys who thinks technology is ruining golf. Equipment innovation has expanded access and made the game more enjoyable for millions. Better gear means more people can hit it straighter, farther, with more consistency. That’s a good thing.
At the same time, I think we need to be honest about what AI fitting can and cannot do. It can’t give you a swing. It can’t cure a fundamental flaw in your mechanics. It can’t make you want to practice. What it can do—what it might do—is help ensure that the clubs in your hands are optimized for how you actually swing, not how someone thinks you should swing.
The Fully Equipped episode tapping into this question with genuine curiosity rather than either uncritical enthusiasm or dismissive skepticism is exactly the right approach. These conversations matter because equipment genuinely does matter in golf, even if it’s not the most important thing.
I’ll be watching this space closely. In three-and-a-half decades of covering this game, I’ve learned that the intersection of technology and golf always produces something interesting. Usually it produces something good. And occasionally, it produces something that changes how the game is played.
AI club fitting might be all three.

