South Africa Showed LIV Golf What It Can Actually Be—And It’s Worth Paying Attention To
Look, I’ve been around this game long enough to know when something genuinely resonates versus when it’s just noise and sponsorship money trying to manufacture excitement. After 35 years covering professional golf—including some lean years when I was lugging Tom Lehman’s bag through rain and doubt—I can usually smell the difference between authentic sporting drama and manufactured spectacle.
What happened at Steyn City in South Africa this past week? That was the real thing.
I’m not saying LIV Golf has suddenly figured it all out, or that the Saudi-backed circuit is destined to save professional golf. That’s oversimplification, and anyone who tells you they know where this all ends up in five years is either a fortune teller or a fool. But what I am saying is this: LIV’s event in South Africa exposed something important about what the tour has been missing, and what it might actually become if it plays its cards right.
When Geography Becomes Destiny
Here’s what struck me most about this week, and it’s something I suspect a lot of casual fans might have missed while watching the final leaderboard: LIV thrives when it goes places that have been starved of elite professional golf.
South Africa has produced world-class golfers. The Springboks of the fairway, so to speak. Yet how often does a major tournament land there? How many times have South African fans gotten to watch Bryson DeChambeau and Jon Rahm battle in their own backyard? The answer, historically, is: not nearly enough.
Dean Burmester, playing in front of his home crowd, put it better than I ever could:
“Greatest week of my life. Honestly, collectively, the greatest four days I’ve had on the golf course, the most fun. I didn’t get down on myself once, which is something I tend to do, and it was impossible, everybody shouting my name, and just smiling, telling jokes, and shouting crazy things out there. It was amazing.”
That’s not hype. That’s a man genuinely overwhelmed by the atmosphere his country created. In my experience, you can’t manufacture that kind of emotion. Either the crowd cares or it doesn’t, and South Africa cared deeply.
The DeChambeau Factor and Dramatic Finishes
Let’s talk about Bryson DeChambeau for a second, because his presence at LIV events has become increasingly important to the tour’s credibility. At 26 under par through 72 holes, tied with Jon Rahm, we got exactly what golf fans actually want to see: two elite players going head-to-head in sudden death with everything on the line.
That’s not LIV Golf philosophy—that’s just good golf. That’s drama.
What Gary Player recognized in his social media response is worth noting:
“To watch two of the world’s finest competitors going head-to-head in a playoff is exactly the kind of drama that lifts our sport and captivates fans at the course and around the globe.”
Player, who won 165 professional tournaments across a career that spanned continents and decades, knows what authentic sporting theatre looks like. He’s seen it in every corner of the golf world. And he’s saying this week in South Africa measured up.
I think that matters more than some people realize. LIV has taken criticism—much of it deserved—for prioritizing format gimmicks over genuine competition. But when you get the right location, the right field, and let the golf actually determine the outcome, suddenly those criticisms feel less relevant.
The Nationalism Question
Here’s where I need to be honest, though. LIV’s success in South Africa reveals something about the tour’s real formula, and it’s not entirely about superior golf.
Having caddied in the ’90s and covered the tour since the late ’80s, I’ve watched national pride drive attendance and passion in ways that pure sporting excellence sometimes can’t. The Ryder Cup works partly because of brilliant golf, sure, but also because people are invested in where they’re from.
LIV figured out that you can bottle that feeling by traveling to underserved markets. Adelaide worked. South Africa worked. And now LIV has already announced they’re returning in 2027.
The question is: can they find enough of these spots? The article notes that “Both Australia and South Africa have staked strong claims to be considered if the PGA Championship goes global, or a fifth major is ever introduced.” That’s the real prize for LIV—legitimacy through major championship positioning.
What Comes Next
Player closed his social media post with this thought:
“Just as the Nedbank Golf Challenge does, I have no doubt this event will also help inspire the next generation of young South Africans to pick up a club and dream big.”
That’s the long-term play, and honestly, it’s the most compelling argument for what LIV could become. If you’re building professional golf infrastructure in emerging markets, you’re thinking 10, 15, 20 years ahead. You’re thinking about the next Ernie Els or Louis Oosthuizen coming from somewhere that previously had no pathway to the world’s best tours.
Does that justify everything about LIV Golf? No. The governance questions remain. The integration debate with the PGA Tour continues to simmer. The fundamental structure of professional golf is still unsettled.
But what I saw in South Africa was a tour finding its actual purpose beyond the money and the format innovations: bringing world-class professional golf to people and places that deserve it. When that happens, when genuine passion meets elite competition, the results speak for themselves.
LIV’s challenge now isn’t winning over the existing golf establishment. It’s finding more South Africas, more Adelaides—places hungry for what professional golf can deliver when it shows up ready to compete and celebrate.
If they can do that repeatedly, we’re looking at something that lasts.

